On 2015-01-13, Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I know we've no formalized license policy for StackForge > hosting, though I think there's an assumption that it needs to be > redistributable under an OSI/DFSG/FSF recognized license variant. > Certainly hosting a derivative work of software which is under a > more "copyleft" license brings those additional license terms with > it, and seems like a reasonably pragmatic choice to me (compared > with the alternative of reinventing the wheel entirely in a > clean-room effort to avoid the original license terms). > > http://ci.openstack.org/stackforge.html
Sounds good, thanks. Csaba _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
