On 04/27/2015 02:33 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Spencer Krum <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> The primary maintainer of puppetboard is stepping aside: >> https://github.com/puppet-community/puppetboard/issues/132. We use >> puppetboard to display facts from machines and reports of puppet runs. We >> can expect to continue to have this need into puppet 4 and puppet apply. I >> like the idea of infra trying to help this project (we've already landed a >> couple features) but I know we have to be strategic in where we put our >> efforts. There is nothing wrong with our current installation (in fact it >> could use an upgrade, it is almost a year out of date). >> >> There are at least two open source options if we wanted to look at >> switching: Puppet-explorer: https://github.com/spotify/puppetexplorer and >> Panopuppet: https://github.com/propyless/panopuppet > > As a data point, prior to puppetboard, we used Puppet Dashboard, a > fork of which we considered: > https://github.com/sodabrew/puppet-dashboard > > At the recent PuppetCampSF, author sodabrew did a talk on his plans > for version 2, following a have-kids hiatus on the project. He's not > planning on making distro-based packages (his expertise and time is > better spent on project dev), but it may be worth considering again > anyway. > > Refresher, this is the bug report from the last time we did this, > includes what we evaluated then: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1218631 > > It would be awesome if we didn't have to do this every year :\ > I'll also note that both puppetexplorer and panopuppet essentially have one active developer apiece right now.
Not that that helps sway one way or the other. Thanks, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
