I am happy to do that too Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno 02 mag 2016, alle ore 12:46, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > I appreciate you starting this thread Paul. > > Being able to collaborate with other folks from the infra team on preparing > talks for confs is > great, and gives the chance to people who are interested in the project but > are 'shy' to speak up > alone in stage to overcome that barrier. > > This will also avoid having talks with repeating topics on same/similar confs. > > Looking forward to collaborate on upcoming confs :-) . > > Ricky > > 2016-05-02 20:55 GMT+02:00 Spencer Krum <[email protected]>: >> I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start >> a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate >> attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each >> other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel >> any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination >> sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear >> to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct >> place is something we should be careful to do. >> >> We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on >> talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > >> > Now that OpenStack Austin has come and gone, I was hoping to continue the >> > dialog about speaking opportunity for other conferences. One of my >> > personal >> > goals this year is to talk more about the tooling we support to other >> > people >> > and projects. Projects like nodepool, zuulv2.5, grafyaml and bindep come >> > to >> > mind. >> > >> > However, I am reluctant on submitting talks to other conferences without >> > giving >> > some sort of heads up to everybody. I think how we collaborated on our >> > Austin >> > talks worked quiet well and what I guess I am asking should we consider >> > doing to >> > same for other conferences? >> > >> > Or I am just being paranoid. >> > >> > PB >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >> >> >> -- >> Spencer Krum >> [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346! > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > !DSPAM:1,5727aeea23291550978346!
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
