On 2016-12-20 10:19:26 -0800 (-0800), James E. Blair wrote: [...] > I think we should change the provider images section to separate out the > parts pertaining to diskimages and those pertaining to flavors. > Something like: [...] > providers: > - name: cloud > diskimages: > - name: ubuntu-trusty > metadata: > foo: bar > labels: > - name: small-ubuntu-trusty > ram: 2g > - name: large-ubuntu-trusty > ram: 8g [...] > Does this sound like a reasonable path forward?
I have a strong preference for the proposed model, as it still allows for differing label-to-flavor mapping per provider while simplifying the relationship between providers, images and flavors compared to the old nodepool~=0.3 implementation. -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
