I do like the logo and I am sure it look really cool in print. At the same time I find it not simple enough for use as a (fav)icon — where it will likely render like a pink dot. Remember times where this meant 16x16? :)
Too many lines and too thin to make it recognisable at small sizes (even with retina displays). Maybe we could have a special low-detail version that is appropriate for this use case? -- sorin > On 7 Feb 2019, at 22:51, Clark Boylan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > As the Gerrit hosting (gitea) spec [0] gets closer and closer to running in > production as a preview site we suddenly have more of a need for establishing > the opendevyness of the site. During the name selection one of the benefits > of "opendev" was that the foundation had already done branding and logo work > for the name in its use with the conferences in prior years. James was kind > enough to put together a quick pdf of the current logo and what it might look > like on a couple of our existing sites (see [0]). > > I'm throwing this out here so we can take a quick look at it. If there aren't > objections to moving forward with this existing set of artifacts I'll work > with James to get a set of reusable files for things like gitea. > > [0] https://tarballs.openstack.org/ci/OpenDev_Examples.pdf > > Clark > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
