On 21/12/14 08:09, matt wrote: > the only issue with nova-network here is that it's FINALLY slated to be > removed in the next release.
Is it? :) Based on recent emails, it seems like the requisite migration path might not make it (and here's also hoping that DVR improves). The other thing to note is that if the migration does make it in Kilo, there's probably a 'deprecation' cycle before removal of nova-network. > so yes it will work, and it may even be optimal for this size > deployment, but it will NOT be at all future proofed. > > I'd go with neutron as of now. > > -matt > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, George Shuklin > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello. > > I've suddenly got request for small installation of openstack (about > 3-5 computes). > > They need almost nothing (just a management panel to span simple > instances, few friendly tennants), and I curious, is nova-network > good solution for this? They don't want network node and do 'network > node on compute' is kinda sad. > > (And one more: did anyone tried to put management stuff on compute > node in mild production?) > > _________________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.__openstack.org > <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-operators > <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
