On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Subbu Allamaraju <[email protected]> wrote:
> Regarding the discussion on tags, here is my take from the discussion on
> Monday.
>
> 1. There is vehement agreement that having an integrated release consisting
> of a small “inner ring” set of service is desirable. There are 6-7 projects
> that a majority of operators deploy.
>
> 2. There is a general concern that dropping the integrated release process
> entirely creates more operability hurdles than that exist today.

There was definite concern about co-gating, being sure there is a
defined set of core project releases that work together. I don't think
fixing these in an integrated release was seen as the only solution.

For example if Neutron is releasing versions foo, bar and baz that all
gate with Nova foo there's no pressing reason that nova need to make
three releases just to keep naming in sync (or vice versa if Nova
moves at higher velocity the Neutron)

The pressing need i s the ability to express that when the cogating
set changes  so it is easily discoverable what set is tested togather.
Keeping the core integrated may be the simplest solution but I don't
think it was the only option in the room.

> 3. Many other projects are not seeing adoption for reasons such as lacking a
> minimum viable feature set, lack of operational feedback, concerns on
> scalability etc. Examples include designate, trove, zaqar, ceilometer etc.
>
> 4. There is also a concern of whether tags make the tent too large and
> chaotic as any project can essentially claim to be an OpenStack project.
> This may leave it open for vendors and distro providers to define a product
> out of those OpenStack projects, eventually fragmenting the open source
> nature

> 5. Operators can certainly help shape an MVP feature set.

there is a list of email volunteer on
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tags to make up a ops-tags
working group to continue these discussions, so anyone who couldn't
make it to PHL and is interested in being part of that working group
should probably sign on on the etherpad.

also those of us who have already signed on should probably figure out
what that means in terms of email discussion (should it be her or on
the user-comittee list or somewhere else) and possibly IRC meetings or
what have you...

-Jon

> Subbu
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Daniel Comnea <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Are you aware of any other feedback etherpads for the other discussions?
>
> Cheers,
> Dani
>
> P.S for Nova Sean provided one of the best summaries.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tim Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think there is any recording. The etherpads and summaries on
>> superuser.openstack.org give a feeling for the discussions though and are an
>> interesting read. The tags one looked particularly lively.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Adam Huffman [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: 10 March 2015 10:50
>> > To: Daniel Comnea
>> > Cc: Tim Bell; [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops meetup
>> >
>> > I was going to ask that too...
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Comnea <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Tim,
>> > >
>> > > For those who can't be physically there, will be any sort of
>> > > recordings/ output coming out from this sessions?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dani
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Tim Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Great to see lots of input for the ops meetup nexts week. Feel free
>> > >> to add your items to the agenda
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Session Etherpads:
>> > >>
>> > >>     Draft Agenda:
>> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-Februar
>> > >> y/006268.html
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Monday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-OVS
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-security
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-app-eco-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tools-wg
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-large-deployments
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tags
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-hardware
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Tuesday
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-nova-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-network-performance
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-capacity-mgmt
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-testing-interop
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-burning-issues
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-packaging
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-telco
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-arch-show-tell
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Feedback on the event & what you'd like to see in Vancouver:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-feedback
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > >> [email protected]
>> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operato
>> > >> rs
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
>> > > s
>> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to