Mike is talking about our specific way of doing floating ips - which is not the 
default for neutron, so you do *NOT* have to add an allowed-address pair for 
the floating ip to work.

You will however have to add to the security group rules to allow traffic from 
whatever networks are connecting to your floating ip.  The reason for this is 
because the floating Ip is performed via nat.  So traffic from say the internet 
hits the floating IP and is destination nat'd to the IP of you vm.  So from 
your vm's stand point it sees traffic from the internet trying to connect to 
it.  If the security group rules on the vm do not allow this traffic it will be 
dropped.
____________________________________________

Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.


From: Michael Dorman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 8:38 AM
To: OpenStack Operators 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [Neutron]floatingip with security group

Yup, you need to configure an "address pair" for the floating IP.  This isn't 
specifically a security groups thing, but it will allow traffic to the floating 
IP to pass into the VM to which it is associated.

Under the covers, it's implemented similarly to security groups, but is not 
directly a security groups function.


From: LeeKies
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 2:42 AM
To: OpenStack Operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [Neutron]floatingip with security group

I create a VM with a default security group , then I create and associate a 
floating ip with this VM.
But I can't connect the floating ip, I check the security group, and I think 
it's the sg problem. I add a rule in default sg, and then I can connect the 
floating ip.

When I create a floating ip , Does I have to add a rule in security group to 
allow the ip for ingress ??
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to