Hi Team,
I have installed kilo on Ubuntu 14.04. Everything was working fine but
suddenly, I am getting an error in glance image-list.
Before installing mongodb, it was working fine. But now, it is not.
root@kilocontroller:/home/oss# glance image-list
None is not of type u'string'
Failed validating u'type' in schema[u'properties'][u'ramdisk_id']:
{u'description': u'ID of image stored in Glance that should be used as the
ramdisk when booting an AMI-style image.',
u'is_base': False,
u'pattern':
u'^([0-9a-fA-F]){8}-([0-9a-fA-F]){4}-([0-9a-fA-F]){4}-([0-9a-fA-F]){4}-([0-9a-fA-F]){12}$',
u'type': u'string'}
On instance[u'ramdisk_id']:
None
I have checked the google but not able to find the resolution for it.
Could you let me know what I'm doing wrong.
Kind thoughts,
Bhumika Jain
-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
[mailto:openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 55, Issue 23
Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
openstack-operators-ow...@lists.openstack.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Tracing requests across services in the logs (Simon Pasquier)
2. Re: Introducing the Ops Tags Team (Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona)
3. [App-Catalog] Planning/working session Wednesday in Vancouver
(Christopher Aedo)
4. [Large Deployments Team] Today's sessions (Matt Van Winkle)
5. [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit
Operations Containers Session (Richard Raseley)
6. Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova]
[neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session
(Daniel Comnea)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 05:39:57 -0700
From: Simon Pasquier <spasqu...@mirantis.com>
To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Tracing requests across services in the
logs
Message-ID:
<CAOq3GZVqTR69freOcRr+TVt2LdNsvNn33=vS=fTSzOWD=rr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi,
During the ops session on logging [0], we discussed how to correlate between
request ids when a request crosses service boundaries.
I'd encourage everybody interested by this effort to look at the proposed
specifications [1] [2] and provide feedback. One of the questions raised is
whether it makes sense to have a unique request id or different request ids per
service with a way to map them together.
BR,
Simon
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-logging
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164582/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150520/a1b1e80a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:51:17 +0200
From: "Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <j...@bitergia.com>
To: Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org>
Cc: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Introducing the Ops Tags Team
Message-ID: <1432126277.2721.93.ca...@bitergia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I'm not at Vancouver, but I'm interested in this wg. I've included some
comments in the etherpad, mainly about opportunities for automation, and at the
end a proposal on how to express tags using JSON. I would appreciate any
summary from the working session.
Saludos,
Jesus.
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 23:04 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> By now you should have seen Thierry's "The Way Forward" blog[1], which
> describes the problems with having just one binary flag to say whether
> a project is 'good' or not (the integrated release), and proposes the
> tags system.
>
> The tags system lets us make up a series of labels for each software
> project in the OpenStack ecosystem to help people in their decision
> making. As Ops, we have a lot of knowledge about what works, and how
> it works. We're also in a good position to define what it is our
> fellow Ops actually needed to know before they choose to deploy something.
>
>
> It's my great pleasure to announce the formation of the Ops Tag Team.
>
>
> Continuing from the initial work done by the user committee and those
> of us who made it to Philadelphia[2], the Vancouver summit is the time
> to really get this effort ramped up. The team will have a working
> session to define the initial set of tags.
>
> There are a range of questions you likely have, and many an effort
> needed on scoping this activity to be the most useful it can be. I've
> attempted to kick-start some things on the etherpad for that session,
> and your edits and tag suggestions there would be appreciated:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-tags
>
>
> Please do make that etherpad as useful as possible :) The room we have
> at the summit is limited in size, and really designed for those who
> plan to make ongoing contributions to the activity to do actual work.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom, on behalf of the User Committee
>
> [1] http://ttx.re/the-way-forward.html
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-tags
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
> s
--
Bitergia: http://bitergia.com
/me at Twitter: https://twitter.com/jgbarah
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 07:32:42 -0700
From: Christopher Aedo <ca...@mirantis.com>
To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [App-Catalog] Planning/working session
Wednesday in Vancouver
Message-ID:
<CAMtawZUWoOGcScaEvov1=8dkoM+=k8jw5f9-fl45x0q+jh+...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
[Cross-posting to both dev and operators list because I believe this
is important to both groups]
For those of us who have been working on the OpenStack Community App
Catalog (http://apps.openstack.org) yesterday was really exciting. We
had a chance to do a quick demo and walk through during the keynote,
followed by a longer talk in the afternoon (slides here:
http://www.slideshare.net/aedocw/openstack-community-app-catalog-httpappsopenstackorg)
The wiki page with more details is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/App-Catalog
If you are in Vancouver and are interested in helping improve the
Community App Catalog please join us for this working session:
http://sched.co/3Rk4 (11:50 room 116/117)
Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/YVR-app-catalog-plans
If you can't join the session but have ideas or thoughts you would
like to see discussed please add them to the etherpad. I've put down
a few of the ideas that have come up so far, but it's definitely not a
comprehensive list.
We got really great feedback yesterday afternoon and found a lot of
people are interested in contributing to the catalog and working
together to add improvements. Hopefully you can join us today!
-Christopher
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:21:03 +0000
From: Matt Van Winkle <mvanw...@rackspace.com>
To: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [Large Deployments Team] Today's
sessions
Message-ID: <d182108b.154a4b%mvanw...@rackspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello folks,
Back at our last meeting, we decided to focus on three areas in or triple
summit sessions today:
Capacity related specs
Cells V2 related work
General business
Not much has materialize from a capacity management perspective, so for now,
I've also lumped in some time to discuss the backlog specs that John Garbutt
brought up recently
(http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/backlog/)
For the Cells V2 work, Andrew Laski gave me some blueprints he'd really like
feedback on, so we'll look at those and discuss anything else cells related
that is important.
Instead of general business for the team, I'm taking the opportunity to get
Nova, Neutron and LDT folks in the room. This will largely be to help both
Nova and Neutron devs understand how we use our networks - especially with
cells - in order to further the work of getting Neutron to support our needs.
We've been working to get folks from all sides in, but we'll see if schedules
allow. In an attempt to be successful at that, I've put this session in the
middle at 14:40 based on feedback from some folks we'd like there and their
other commitments today.
I've thrown together as much as I can in the etherpad already
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-large-deployments
I'll be in most of the Nova design sessions this morning, so I'll add/edit as
necessary based on output from those if they will influence/outweigh the things
we have planned to go over. Also, in places where nova needs operator input on
the decisions being made (that isn't available at the time), I'll find a spot
on our agenda to see if we can quickly close the feedback loop here at the
summit.
See you this afternoon!
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150520/28534f34/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:45:34 -0700
From: Richard Raseley <rich...@raseley.com>
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
<openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack Operators Mailing List
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [glance] [kolla] [magnum] [nova]
[neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers Session
Message-ID: <555d54de.60...@raseley.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
I apologize if this message is inappropriately broad, but I wanted to
share the results of the Vancouver Summit operations containers
session[0] we held yesterday with all of the projects which were mentioned.
This was a great discussion with approximately two-dozen individuals in
attendance. Most of the conversation was captured pretty well on the
etherpad, which can be found here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-containers
A big thank you to everyone who participated - it was really informative.
Regards,
Richard Raseley
SysOps Engineer @ Puppet Labs
[0] - http://sched.co/3B45
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 05:56:04 +0100
From: Daniel Comnea <comnea.d...@gmail.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: OpenStack Operators Mailing List
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [glance] [kolla]
[magnum] [nova] [neutron] Vancouver Summit Operations Containers
Session
Message-ID:
<caobanzn6z2gtzatpk-0dgee1e8kyp9-frzdxeo52w00ya_z...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Great info, thanks for sharing.
Since i couldn't attend the summit, are there any AIs which needs to
happen/ take place and which i can keep an eye on?
thanks,
Dani
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Richard Raseley <rich...@raseley.com>
wrote:
> I apologize if this message is inappropriately broad, but I wanted to
> share the results of the Vancouver Summit operations containers session[0]
> we held yesterday with all of the projects which were mentioned.
>
> This was a great discussion with approximately two-dozen individuals in
> attendance. Most of the conversation was captured pretty well on the
> etherpad, which can be found here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-containers
>
> A big thank you to everyone who participated - it was really informative.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Raseley
>
> SysOps Engineer @ Puppet Labs
>
> [0] - http://sched.co/3B45
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150521/e253c55f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 55, Issue 23
***************************************************
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic
communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant
messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes
of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture
policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
