I agree with the repo being licensed and everything in it being
inherited, unless otherwise specified.
Thanks for the quick movement on this, everyone!
On 11/20/15 11:13 AM, JJ Asghar wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 11/19/15 10:40 PM, Joe Topjian wrote:
Unless there's a reason why we *can't* do something like that (I have no
idea why, but I never assume anything when it comes to things like
licensing :) then I'm in favor of updating the README to state "Your
code will be licensed under Apache 2 unless you mention otherwise."
I love this idea. I saw the review come in, we should get that merged ASAP.
- --
Best Regards,
JJ Asghar
c: 512.619.0722 t: @jjasghar irc: j^2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=K+jB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
