Hi everyone, The Product WG is finalizing our mid-cycle plans and I wanted to confirm the conclusion of this thread to bring into that discussion...
Reviewing the numerous responses here, it seems like the majority opted for option #1 (one 'official' ops mid-cycle but not precluding regional ones) and, in this specific instance, the 'official' one is the one happening in Manchester. Would you agree with this summary? If we want to attempt a hub/spoke model (e.g. start etherpad-based conversations at the 'official' mid-cycle but continue to build on those topics at the regional events) then we can also discuss ideas on how to help with the effort of summarizing discussions and topics. Thanks, Shamail On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Clayton O'Neill <clay...@oneill.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Erik McCormick < > emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote: > >> > 2) More technically we'll need to address the challenge of local >> > sound, how to we ensure all the mostly spontaious talk in a large work >> > session makes it to remote participants. Passing a mic is a bit >> > cumbersome and hard to enforce, while mic'ing the room to properly get >> > ambient sound isn't likely something we can do without significant >> > professional help. >> > >> >> This is a technical issue that needs dealing with for sure. Passing a >> mic is absolutely not practical, so it would need to be some sort of >> ambient thing. We can't even get people to consistently go to a mic >> during Q&A at the end of summit presentations. I've seen enough >> teleconferencing systems that cover large boardroom settings to know >> that such things exist, but I have no specific knowledge of what they >> are, if they can be rented, or how much they cost. That will require a >> lot of digging into. > > > A key difference between the Ceph summit and the Ops Mid-cycle appears to > be that the Ops Mid-cycle is at least an order of magnitude bigger. > > For a good amount of the Philly and Palo Alto mid-cycles there were 200ish > people in a single room. Audio was a problem even for people sitting in > the room at times. I think this is beyond “large boardroom” size. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
