Thierry, this can work, of course, but in that case we won't have, for instance, ready reviewing mechanism for test plans. That is not the biggest deal I suppose, feedback can be collected in various ways. So if wiki will be the decision, I suppose it's ok.
Probably some operators will comment as well, as i suspect they will be one of the groups interesting in such docs source. Cheers Dina On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > Dina Belova wrote: > > I'm writing to find out where to place information that Performance Team > > would like to share with community. We would like to share (and grab the > > feedback on) test plans (for OpenStack itself - we can use and develop > > Rally, for underlying layers like DB, MQ something else.), results of > > those testing, results of various investigations, etc... I think it'll > > be very useful to have some web page or whatever where we'll be able to > > show all the progress. > > > > Although Performance Team is not (yet :)) official OpenStack team, so we > > cannot simply use docs.openstack.org <http://docs.openstack.org> for > > this purpose for just team's needs. I had a quick chat with Anne, she > > suggested to use Rally as an umbrella for this potential docs > > repository, but only part of the information will be related there to > > Rally in fact. > > > > So please share your opinion on what can be done here :) > > In the past we've liberally used the wiki as a free publishing space... > Would that be an option for you ? > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-TC mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc > -- Best regards, Dina Belova Software Engineer Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
