On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Belmiro Moreira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > thanks Carl for info about the DHCP plans.
Olá, Belmiro. > Our DHCP concern is because currently the DHCP agent needs to be assigned > to a network and then it creates a port for each subnet. Right, this is a concern for me too. > In our infrastructure we only consider a network with several hundred > subnets. > By default the DHCP agent runs in the network node however when using > provider > networks and segmentation the DHCP requests will not reach it. Yep, that is the issue. > My understanding is that the plan is to have the DHCP agent per segment. > That is great. Correct. > But it will continue to create a port per subnet? > Looking into our usecase (only provided networks with segmentation) I don't > see why it > should create ports. So, we'll need to look in to this. It might be something we can look at independently. First, I'd like a little more information on your "several hundred subnets." Do you see these mapping to hundreds of segments? I guess what I'm after is "what do you envision will be your ratio of subnets to segments?" Carl _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
