Hi, Hope you have already gone through this document... if not FYI http://docs.openstack.org/ops-guide/arch_storage.html
As Saverio said, Ceph is widely adopted solution. For small clouds, we found that NFS is much affordable solution in terms of cost and the complexity. --- Regards, Sampath On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Saverio Proto <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > a very widely adopted solution is to use Ceph with rbd volumes. > > http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/ceph-rados.html > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/ > > you find more options here under Volume drivers: > http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/section_volume-drivers.html > > Saverio > > > 2016-06-21 9:27 GMT+02:00 Michael Stang <[email protected]>: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder what is the recommendation for a shared storage for the compute >> nodes? At the moment we are using an iSCSI device which is served to all >> compute nodes with multipath, the filesystem is OCFS2. But this makes it a >> little unflexible in my opinion, because you have to decide how many compute >> nodes you will have in the future. >> >> So is there any suggestion which kind of shared storage to use for the >> compute nodes and what filesystem? >> >> Thanky, >> Michael >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
