Sounds like a recipe for confusion? On 1 August 2016 at 10:23, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > On 7/31/16, 7:13 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 07/29/2016 11:35 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because >>> it requires a member user. We have a few approaches to fixing this >>> problem in mind, but want to understand what Operators want. Devstack >>> itself has switched between member and _member_ although Devstack isn't >>> our reference: Operators are. >>> >>> Which of those do operators prefer (if either). >>> >>> Another question was whether we should create a default user named >>> "user" and use this in place of member. >> >>"member" is a role, not a user. The default unprivileged user is named >>"demo" and has the "member" role in a project called "demo". > > Yup, thanks for the correction. > >> >>Are you asking what the name of the unprivileged *role* should be by >>default in Kolla installations? Or are you asking what, if any, a >>default unprivileged *user* should be called? > > The idea of adding a user called "user" with a role called "user" was > proposed. Curious if operators care to want that. > > Regards > -steve > >> >>Best, >>-jay >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OpenStack-operators mailing list >>OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
