I as well would be pretty interested -Matt
On 2016-11-15, 7:41 AM, "Tobias Schön" <tobias.sc...@fiberdata.se> wrote: >This sounds very interesting indeed, i'll join up on that aswell! > >//Tobias > >-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >Från: Mohammed Naser [mailto:mna...@vexxhost.com] >Skickat: den 15 november 2016 16:30 >Till: m...@mattjarvis.org.uk >Kopia: OpenStack Operators; user-committee >Ämne: Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working >Group > >This sounds very interesting, put us down! :) > >On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:43 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> >wrote: >> So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd >> very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, >> with the very high level goal of representing the interests of the >> public cloud provider community around the globe. >> >> I'd like to propose that, in line with the new process for creation of >> working groups, we set up some initial IRC meetings for all interested >> parties. The goals for these initial meetings would be : >> >> 1. Define the overall scope and mission statement for the working >> group 2. Set out the constituency for the group - communication >> methods, definitions of public clouds, meeting schedules, chairs etc. >> 3. Identify areas of interest - eg. technical issues, collaboration >> opportunities >> >> Before I go ahead and schedule first meetings, I'd very much like to >> gather input from the community on interested parties, and if this >> seems like a reasonable first step forward. My thought initially was >> to schedule a first meeting on #openstack-operators and then decide on >> best timings, locations and communication methods from there, but again >>I'd welcome input. >> >> At this point it would seem to me that one of the key metrics for this >> working group to be successful is participation as widely as possible >> within the public cloud provider community, currently approximately 21 >> companies globally according to >>https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/public-clouds/. >> If we could get representation from all of those companies in any >> potential working group, then that would clearly be the best outcome, >> although that may be optimistic ! As has become clear at recent Ops >> events, it may be that not all of those companies are represented on >> these lists, so I'd welcome any input on the best way to reach out to >>those folks. >> >> Matt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator >> s >> > > > >-- >Mohammed Naser ‹ vexxhost >----------------------------------------------------- >D. 514-316-8872 >D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 >E. mna...@vexxhost.com >W. http://vexxhost.com > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-operators mailing list >OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-operators mailing list >OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators