Thank you Mark for writing this up! If you are interested in new interop programs, please comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472785/. In addition, we will also be discussing this during our weekly meeting on Wednesday, 11:00 AM CST/ 16:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. If you cannot join us for the meeting at that time, find us in #openstack-interop channel.
Thank you, Egle On 6/9/17, 3:55 PM, "Mark Voelker" <mvoel...@vmware.com> wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >Happy Friday! There have been a number of discussions (at the PTG, at >OpenStack Summit, in Interop WG and Board of Directors meetings, etc) >over the past several months about the possibility of creating new >interoperability programs in addition to the existing OpenStack Powered >program administered by the Interop Working Group (formerly the DefCore >Committee). In particular, lately there have been a lot of discussions >recently [1] about where to put tests associated with trademark programs >with respect to some existing TC guidance [2] and community goals for >Queens [3]. Although these potential new programs have been discussed in >a number of places, it¹s a little hard to keep tabs on where we¹re at >with them unless you¹re actively following the Interop WG. Given the >recent discussions on openstack-dev, I thought it might be useful to try >and brain dump our current thinking on what these new programs might look >like into a document somewhere that people could point at in discussions >rather than discussing abstracts and working off memories from prior >meetings. To that end, I took a first stab at it this week which you can >find here: > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472785/ > >Needless to say this is just a draft to try to get some of the ideas out >of neurons and on to electrons, so please don¹t take it to be firm >consensus‹rather consider it a draft of what we¹re currently thinking and >an invitation to collaborate. I expect that other members of the Interop >Working Group will be leaving comments in Gerrit as we hash through this, >and we¹d love to have input from other folks in the community as well. >These programs potentially touch a lot of you (in fact, almost all of >you) in some way or another, so we¹re happy to hear your input as we work >on evolving the interop programs. Quite a lot has happened over the past >couple of years, so we hope this will help folks understand where we came >from and think about whether we want to make changes going forward. > >By the way, for those of you who might find an HTML-rendered document >easier to read, click on the "gate-interop-docs-ubuntu-xenial² link in >the comments left by Jenkins and then on ³Extension Programs - Current >Direction². Thanks, and have a great weekend! > >[1] >http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/thread.html#11 >7657 >[2] >https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20160504-defcore-test-loca >tion.html >[3] >https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/split-tempest-plugins.htm >l > >At Your Service, > >Mark T. Voelker >_______________________________________________ >Interop-wg mailing list >interop...@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/interop-wg _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
