I'm not aware of any studies as per se, but we have long run rabbitmq, MySQL, and all the API endpoints on the same three nodes.
On Aug 25, 2017 6:12 PM, "Imtiaz Chowdhury" <imtiaz.chowdh...@workday.com> wrote: > Hi Openstack operators, > > > > Most Openstack HA deployment use 3 node database cluster, 3 node rabbitMQ > cluster and 3 Controllers. I am wondering whether there are any studies > done that show the pros and cons of co-locating database and messaging > service with the Openstack control services. In other words, I am very > interested in learning about advantages and disadvantages, in terms of ease > of deployment, upgrade and overall API performance, of having 3 all-in-one > Openstack controller over a more distributed deployment model. > > > > References to any work done in this area will be highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > Imtiaz > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
