Massimo, Following Rob’s comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342>, would you be willing to write up a blueprint? Mateusz would then prepare our code and submit it to gerrit as a partial implementation (as we only have the user facing part, not the admin panel).
Cheers, Arne > On 25 Sep 2017, at 10:46, Arne Wiebalck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, nice, wasn’t aware. Mateusz is one of the Horizon experts here at CERN I > was referring to :) > >> On 25 Sep 2017, at 10:41, Massimo Sgaravatto <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Just found that there is already this one: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342 >> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1717342> >> >> 2017-09-25 10:28 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> Yes I am interested. Are you going to push them to gerrit ? >> Should we open a bug to track this change into Horizon ? >> >> massimo do you want to open the bug on Launchpad ? So if Arne pushed >> the patches on gerrit we can link them to the bug. I pointed >> robcresswell to this thread, he is reading us. >> >> thanks ! >> >> Saverio >> >> 2017-09-25 10:13 GMT+02:00 Arne Wiebalck <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> > Massimo, Saverio, >> > >> > We faced the same issue and have created patches for Horizon to display >> > - the per volume quota in the volume request panel, and also >> > - additional information about the volume type (like IOPS and throughput >> > limits, intended usage etc.) >> > >> > The patches will need some polishing before being sent upstream (I’ll need >> > need to cross-check with our Horizon experts), but we use them in prod >> > since >> > quite a while and are happy to already share patch files if you’re >> > interested. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Arne >> > >> > >> > >> >> On 25 Sep 2017, at 09:58, Saverio Proto <[email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> I am pinging on IRC robcresswell from the Horizon project. He is still >> >> PTL I think. >> >> If you are on IRC please join #openstack-horizon. >> >> >> >> We should ask the Horizon PTL how to get this feature request into >> >> implementation. >> >> >> >> With the command line interface, can you already see the two different >> >> quotas for the two different volume types ? Can you paste an example >> >> output from the CLI ? >> >> >> >> thank you >> >> >> >> Saverio >> >> >> >> >> >> 2017-09-25 9:55 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto >> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >>> We are currently running Mitaka (preparing to update to Ocata). I see the >> >>> same behavior on an Ocata based testbed >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, Massimo >> >>> >> >>> 2017-09-25 9:50 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto <[email protected] >> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hello Massimo, >> >>>> >> >>>> what is your version of Openstack ?? >> >>>> >> >>>> thank you >> >>>> >> >>>> Saverio >> >>>> >> >>>> 2017-09-25 9:13 GMT+02:00 Massimo Sgaravatto >> >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >>>>> Hi >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> In our OpenStack cloud we have two backends for Cinder (exposed using >> >>>>> two >> >>>>> volume types), and we set different quotas for these two volume types. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The problem happens when a user, using the dashboard, tries to create a >> >>>>> volume using a volume type for which the project quota is over: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - the reported error message simply reports "unable to create volume", >> >>>>> without mentioning that the problem is with quota >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - (by default) the dashboard only shows the overall Cinder quota (and >> >>>>> not >> >>>>> the quota per volume) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Do you know if it possible in some to expose on the dashboard the >> >>>>> cinder >> >>>>> quota per volume type ? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, Massimo >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> >>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >>>>> >> >>>>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> >> > >> > -- >> > Arne Wiebalck >> > CERN IT >> > >> > > -- > Arne Wiebalck > CERN IT > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
