> I agree that the service architecture doesn't belong here. I think that it's > sufficiently contentious (I had my own, different, concerns) that it doesn't > belong in a charter.
What specifically would you pull out into a separate proposal? I'm not against splitting it out, but I'd like to understand which parts exactly you have concerns with so we can work on them separate from the rest. >>> 3. I remember some push-back on the "C, C++ and Python" statement, >> but I'm personally fine with "C++ and Python". > > I was the one who objected the first time. My point is that I don't see any > reason to bless C++ than, say, Java. They are both equally widely available, > and both would cause equal amounts of pain and brain-death if you tried to > use them for something like Nova. > > Why get into language wars when we're not using anything other than Python > anyway? > > We could turn this into something vaguer, like "Implementation languages and > libraries must be widely and freely available." I tend to agree with you. Anyone else have opinions on this? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
