Does it make sense to discuss the state/progress on the GitHub migration project? I think someone needs to set some specific target milestones and track this (not necessarily the PPB). As ttx points out, earlier is better; if we miss the end of July milestone for having this complete we will likely need to wait until Diablo is done.
For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done? John -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Purrier Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:10 PM To: 'Jay Pipes'; 'Jonathan Bryce' Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow +1 on being totally transparent. Advocates for projects must be at the meeting where the application is discussed, inevitably questions will come up that can only be answered by someone with project knowledge. Jay, what is your concern with PHP? With all of the project integration work in flight with Keystone, it makes sense to push on this project. John -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Pipes Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:59 AM To: Jonathan Bryce Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Bryce <[email protected]> wrote: > As a reminder, we have a Policy Board meeting scheduled for tomorrow in the > hour before the weekly team meeting. The Policy Board meeting is 2000 > UTC/3:00 PM CDT. > We currently have two incubation applications on the agenda. If you get an > opportunity, please try to review them before the meeting tomorrow. Do you > think we should try to have Sebastian and Devin present in the meeting to > answer questions or discuss first without them? Everything we do should be 100% transparent. I vote we should not only have them at the meeting, but we should be completely honest and up-front about the concerns we've had. In particular, it's going to be tough for Scalr to get past the PHP thing. We have to be honest with them about that. > Scalr incubation application - http://wiki.openstack.org/Scalr > Dashboard incubation application > - http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/IncubatorApplication/OpenStackDashboard > Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to discuss, Keystone... what's going on with that from an incubation perspective. The API proposed seems to have gotten an OK reception, but the API != the project. Where do they stand in the incubation process? -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
