Jonathan Bryce wrote: > We have several agenda items for today's meeting at 2000UTC/3:00 PM > CDT: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/PPB > > 1. Common project tooling and process (autonomy) > 2. Github + Gerrit review > 3. Deadline for Essex core projects applications > > For Item 1, I have created a draft in the > wiki: > http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/ProjectToolingAndPractices . > Please review and let me know any feedback you have or if I missed any > key points from the discussions.
As far as Issue Tracking goes, I think we need a single system that shows all the projects. Users can go there to file bugs on "OpenStack". Then the system should allow, for a given bug number, to set tasks in multiple subprojects and/or downstream projects andor companion projects (documentation tasks for example). That's pretty much the description of how LP currently works, and I think it provides a nice consistent experience for the users and developers. For release timing, I'd add that there is a "default milestone plan" (discussed at the design summit, currently a 4-week plan) that projects should use if they have no reason to use something else. Or consider there is a unique vetted "4-week time-based plan" option and grant Swift an exception retrospectively if they have a reason to differ. There is value in coordinating milestone dates, from an "integrated product" testing standpoint. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
