On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Ewan Mellor <[email protected]> wrote: > Firstly, apologies for not making the PPB meeting today. I was actually > locked in a meeting about OpenStack API support, which is ironic given the > topic of conversation at the PPB today.
Ironic indeed :) > Obviously the API can continue to evolve – it just needs to do so in a > backwards-compatible (or versioned) manner. Agreed. The thing that was being proposed and agreed upon yesterday was about: a) That PTLs control their project's APIs b) That the PPB will set some general guidelines for the APIs c) That a coordinator role should exist to advise PTLs on matters relating to consistency of the project APIs I would be amenable to a diktat (to borrow your term) saying APIs must be backwards compatible for clients built to a prior release series API version. > Also, extensions would be excluded from this – caveat extensor, or > something. Yup. Cheers, -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
