Reviewed: https://review.openstack.org/6191
Committed:
http://github.com/openstack/openstack-common/commit/4acd7829ab0857356594dce3b841f4d785cf2aa1
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master
commit 4acd7829ab0857356594dce3b841f4d785cf2aa1
Author: Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Apr 3 17:05:37 2012 -0400
Change behavior in utils.import_object().
Fix bug 972859.
Prior to this patch, utils.import_object(foo) and
utils.import_class(foo) would return the same thing if foo was the path
to a class. This patch changes utils.import_object() to return an
instance of the class, instead, also allowing you to pass in arguments
to the constructor.
This patch also removes the odd behavior of import_object() to be able
to also import a module. Instead, a new function import_module() has
been added.
Finally, the three import helpers have been moved to a new module,
importutils.
Change-Id: Ia2ea64c965692f8c3a29adec332dd93a83980070
** Changed in: openstack-common
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenStack
Common Drivers, which is the registrant for openstack-common.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972859
Title:
Fix utils.import_object() when trying to get an instance of a class
Status in openstack-common:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
RIght now, utils.import_object('foo') is the same as
utils.import_class('foo') when 'foo' is the path to a class. This
should be fixed so that import_object() returns an instance of that
class (like how this works in nova.utils).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-common/+bug/972859/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
