Done:

https://launchpad.net/openstack-common

Rick, feel free to change the branding to the openstack images, etc...

-jay

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rick Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 This is the only reasonable thing to do.
>
>
> On 08/30/2010 09:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> OK, so is everyone cool with me creating a new project called
>> openstack-common under the openstack umbrella?  This project would be
>> specifically for *Python* common library and utilities.
>>
>> We got a little off-track with discussing bindings (it's a great
>> topic, but not necessarily related to a common Python component
>> library :) )
>>
>> -jay
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Gregory Holt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Okay, I guess I'll just wait for things to start becoming more concrete and 
>>> then maybe I'll see what you're getting at. If we call one a 
>>> language-binding framework and the other a language binding, it's all the 
>>> same to me. :)
>>>
>>> On Aug 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Jorge Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I think we're sorta talking about the same thing.  The part of the 
>>>> code that handles the boiler-plate stuff (what you call the low-level 
>>>> binding) I see as being  the language-binding framework.  The language 
>>>> binding that we share with customers is written on top of that. We can 
>>>> certainly distribute the framework, and develop it in an open source 
>>>> manner, but I see most of our users simply using the binding.
>>>>
>>>> If we follow a basic set of standards for handling collections, error 
>>>> conditions, rate limiting, etc. the only thing that should differ between 
>>>> services are the entity types and the URLs.    We can all share the same 
>>>> basic boiler plate code. The binding just adds the specifics for the 
>>>> individual service.  In a very real sense we are all using the  same 
>>>> underlying base  protocol at that point.  Drivers are written to handle 
>>>> the problem of interacting with varying protocols.  If we're all speaking 
>>>> the same protocol, I don't see the need for a driver.  I'd much rather we 
>>>> standardize at the protocol level then to expect service teams to produce 
>>>> compatibility drivers for each service.  Especially when you consider that 
>>>> there are additional benefits to us standardizing at the protocol anyway.
>>>>
>>>> -jOrGe W.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 28, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Gregory Holt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 28, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Jorge Williams wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I strongly disagree with the idea of us maintaining multiple 
>>>>>> same-language bindings for a single service. This is going lead to 
>>>>>> confusion and additional work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we'll have to agree to strongly disagree. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> In my mind, one would write the low-level bindings first and then the 
>>>>> high-level bindings which would just wrap the low-level ones in a more 
>>>>> abstracted way; so I guess I don't really see the additional work. As far 
>>>>> as confusion, I don't see confusion around an ORM using a lower-level 
>>>>> DB-API/JDBC driver. Providing both is useful. If you provide the ORM and 
>>>>> not the driver, that's frustrating.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, honestly, if there are no official low-level bindings for Swift in 
>>>>> Python, I'll definitely be maintaining my own. See swift/common/client.py 
>>>>> for the boiler-plate I don't want to have to repeat each time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now maybe client.py is the type of bindings you're talking about and I'm 
>>>>> just misinterpreting your idea as even higher-level. In that case, I'm 
>>>>> arguing about the wrong thing. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> Post to     : [email protected]
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : [email protected]
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to