On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote:
> If more documentation enables deployers to properly deploy Nova, it's > in scope. At least, that's my opinion. > In scope for documentation, I meant that flags and paste.deploy don't configure the same types of things. --andy > > -jay > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andy Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > My understanding is that the paste.deploy config is unrelated to the > flags > > system and is rather separate in scope. > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Armando Migliaccio > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I have noticed that recently a new way of configuring nova-api has > been > >> > introduced. It seems that the old gflags style has been replaced in > >> > favour > >> > of paste.deploy style. > >> > > >> > I am trying to find information about this transition, and how old > >> > config > >> > files can be translated to new ones. Do we just past the flags under > the > >> > [DEFAULT] section? I am also wondering if this is going to be done for > >> > other > >> > services other than nova-api. > >> > > >> > This blueprint does not seem to have a lot of information. > >> > >> Hey Todd and Anne, > >> > >> Think we can add a bit of documentation about this? Armando, can you > >> file a bug so that we can track the documentation needs? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> jay > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > >> Post to : [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
