On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Greg wrote: > On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:05, Jorge Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> though we removed the details of this part at the request of the swift team. >> Khaled implement this code to support both the default auth component >> and to integrate the blueprint with swift. The response to our blueprint, >> from the swift guys, was that it wasn't needed. >> >> > > Yes, the swift team is horrible about that. :P To be fair to us though, we do > prefer integration code that actually integrates with something instead of > just the idea of something. Our actual recommendation was to implement a > working system before submitting integration pieces to existing projects. > Also existing tests have to pass. :P >
I don't want this to deteriorate into a flame war but let's get our facts straight: 1) It completely integrated with the existing auth system and it integrated with our default Auth component. 2) All tests passed. I was looking over your shoulder when you ran them. These are facts. They are provable. We can check out the code from the day we made the submit and show you. -jOrGe W. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
