Gabe Westmaas wrote: > Given this, what makes the most sense to me is to focus on stability for > version 1.0 API excluding XML support. The bindings that are out there have > strong support for the JSON data formats in v1.0. As suggested, I think we > call the current mostly implemented 1.1 API experimental so as to give access > to any features that we need that are only in 1.1.
Makes sense for me as well. Since we know we won't reach 100%, we should definitely stop to work on "feature gap bugs" to concentrate on stability for what's already in. NB: It's sometimes difficult in bug triaging to determine which bugs would belong to this stability category: don't hesitate to mention "stability for 1.0 API" in the description somewhere (or ping me) so that their importance can be set accordingly. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
