Lieutenants

The number of people contributing code to nova has grown dramatically over the 
last few months, and it is becoming difficult to maintain a clear picture of 
the entire code base.  I'd like to move towards a somewhat more sectioned view 
of the code, where there is at least one person who is responsible for 
maintaining a given section of code.   This is similar to the process 
[http://p2pfoundation.net/Linux_-_Governance#Linux_Organization] used for linux 
development.

Since it isn't exactly clear who should be the point of contact for each 
section of the code, the first step is to collect a list of interested parties. 
 We have a list that maps core members to areas that they are interested in at 
http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaCore

I've created a wiki page at http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaLieutenants to start 
collecting interested parties.  If you feel like you would be a contact point 
for one of the items on the list, please put your name and contact info in that 
section.  For now I can work with all of the self-selected contact points on 
the list.  Ultimately, as PTL, I would like to work towards having a single 
trusted person for each section of the code to manage commits in that area.

These lieutenants will also give us people to act as PTLs for the new projects 
when we split off sections (like Network and Volume) into their own services.

Team Contact

I'm also trying to compile a list of all of the different teams working on 
Nova.  This will allow me to keep track of the development work being done by 
the various groups.  It would really help if all of the teams could add 
themselves to this list and select a point of contact for me to communicate 
with.  Hopefully we can link all of the blueprints on the teams launchpad page, 
but if you can put a brief overview of the current development effort(s) for 
your team on the wiki page, that will make it easier for people to see what is 
being actively worked on at a glance.

The team page is at http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaTeams

Blueprints

I'm currently going through the 40+ Blueprints and organizing them for the 
design summit.  For the last set of releases there wasn't a whole lot of 
insight into what makes a blueprint "approved" and what being "approved" means. 
 The process we're going through now is simply to approve blueprints for 
discussion at the summit.  The purpose of the summit is to hash out the details 
of the blueprint, argue about alternative solutions and generally to decide 
whether it is a good idea.  The hope is that there will be a general consensus 
amongst the developers at the summit as to whether development should move 
forward along the lines proposed in the blueprint.

My job as PTL will be to asses this consensus and approve the blueprints which 
everyone supports.  If there is a great amount of controversy about a 
particular blueprint, I will likely bring it to a vote by nova-core.  I will 
only attempt to dictate a direction when consensus is impossible.

Some of the blueprints are smallish features and may not warrant a discussion 
on their own.  I will attempt to group these where possible into related 
feature sets so that we can talk about them all at once.  Extremely small 
features may not warrant a discussion at all, and I may just throw them into 
the mailing list for feedback before approving them.  I am also working with 
the various groups that have proposed very related features (like the NaaS 
proposals) to try to come together and standardize on one blueprint.

To clarify, as far as I'm concerned, it is not required to have an approved 
blueprint to work on a feature.  If the consensus is against a blueprint and a 
team/person still thinks it is valuable, the team is more than welcome to 
develop the feature and propose it for merge.  It will likely take a really 
killer implementation to swing popular opinion in favor of the feature, but 
sometimes code trumps design.  It is, however, highly recommended to follow the 
blueprint process as much as possible.  That way I can track the features being 
added by different groups and ensure that work is not duplicated and that all 
the features will play nice together.


Vish
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to