On Apr 21, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > I completely agree that bzr should have better mechanics for sharing > working trees between different branches (the loom plugin does some of > this, if you're interested). Apart for when I'm working on the Linux > kernel, I've never really felt the need for it, but I understand that > many people do.
This right here is my main issue with bzr. I can handle the slowness, but I find it very difficult to maintain multiple branches and share patches between them in bzr. I end up doing a lot of diff | patch -p0. I think git's rebase is far superior to that workflow. I'll take a look at loom, sounds interesting. Vish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
