+1 We have blueprints for migrating nova but it will take some time.
On May 27, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote: > +1 for UUIDs. > > If we agree on this approach, there is some difficulty incorporating it into > nova as Ed has identified. However, any other projects, especially those > hoping to be adopted as Openstack projects by the PPB, can probably switch to > this approach more immediately. > > Just a thought. > > "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> said: > >> On May 27, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Erik Carlin wrote: >> >>> With the proliferation of new openstack services being built, is there any >>> reason >>> not to use UUID as the standard resource ID format? >> >> The consensus at the last summit was to move to UUIDs for instance IDs. >> The >> biggest concerns were that a) it breaks the current API (which can be >> updated), >> and it breaks the EC2 API (which can't be updated). I know that there were >> some >> ideas for working around the ec2 issues, but I don't remember them. >> >> I think moving ahead, UUIDs scale way better than locally-generated >> sequential >> integers. >> >> >> >> -- Ed Leafe >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
