On 08/06/2011, at 3:16 AM, Sherman Boyd wrote:
Proposal looks great!
Thanks.
I'm wondering if you are aware of Redhat's CloudFS project. It adds
namespace isolation, ID isolation, storage encryption and network
encryption to Gluster. Having these kind of features takes a step
towards addressing cloud computing privacy issues.
Yes, we're aware of it. It is great that GlusterFS is getting more
eyeballs of the calibre and experience of Jeff. Overall, some of the
changes in the core and the framework of GlusterFS brought in by
CloudFS, eg. SSL support, will gradually be merged back but for the
rest of the major changes, there is nothing final yet because it is
too early to comment.
Hope that answers your question, if only partly. I am CC'ing Anand
Avati who offered to throw more light on CloudFS and GlusterFS.
Regards
-Shehjar
I'm not sure it's in the scope of your plans, but when I saw your
proposal I thought that it would be nice to have some of these
features as well, or at least space for them on the roadmap.
Best regards,
Sherman Boyd
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Shehjar Tikoo
<[email protected]> wrote:
For those who havent seen this already, GlusterFS proposal is now
available at:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/OpenStack%20Cloud%20Storage%20(Gluster)
Inputs welcome. Please do CC [email protected]
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
