2011/8/31 Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvana...@gmail.com>: >> Can you elaborate on this? Both methods resize the disk, how does the >> second method impose more limitations than the first? > In the first case it is perfectly reasonable to have a whole disk image that > is of a decent size for the base image, so you can get by just fine with the > secondary attached disk if the resize does nothing. So to me that is a lot > more flexible.
Ah, gotcha. Makes sense. -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
