Not sure the 'data that are shared' is the right wording below, but I think I get the point. The one thing that jumps out to me as a current 'issue' is the fact that the instance_types table must be kept in sync. I can't think of anything else at the moment, but there might be something.
And the comment (not quoted below) about 'X' dashboards *I think* is invalid. I don't know much about it.. does it talk more than to API? If not, just point it at top level zone. I'm really not a fan of distributed DB architectures if they can be avoided. They add a lot of unneeded complexity and a lot more potential for breakage. The instance type issue can be solved differently. That said, it can be an interesting discussion topic. :) - Chris On Sep 26, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> It seems like it would be good to talk about this during the conference, >> since it seems sort of odd to have pieces of data that are shared across >> zones along with pieces of data that are not shared across zones. > > What pieces of data are shared across zones? > > > -- Ed Leafe > > This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, > please delete it. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
