Russel Bryant wrote: >> We need to add these codes to maintain compliance. >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02
> To maintain compliance with what? I ask since the linked document is a draft. Waiting until a draft was an official RFC would be an excessive delay. The IETF process is thorough but far from fleet of foot. However, waiting for a draft to be a workgroup product before saying that a project SHOULD comply with it makes sense. Of course if we agree that it is a good idea then we MAY comply with it. I'm not enough of an HTTP/REST expert to have an opinion on that. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
