We should file a bug saying we have missing functionality and link to the spec for a definition of that functionality. The spec itself doesn't need to change.
Brian On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote: > Hi Biran > > Thank you for your reply. > So this is a bug of the doc for now? > > 2011/12/27 Brian Waldon <[email protected]>: >> Hi Nachi! >> >> You are 100% correct, we have not yet implemented that in Nova. I don't see >> any bugs/blueprints referencing this, so maybe if one was created we could >> make sure it gets done. >> >> Thanks! >> Brian >> >> On Dec 26, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: >> >>> Hi folks >>> >>> The doc says *All resizes are automatically confirmed after 24 hours >>> if they are not explicitly confirmed or reverted*, but I couldn't >>> found such implementations. >>> Is this a bug of Nova? or Is this a bug of doc? >>> >>> The resize function converts an existing server to a different flavor, >>> in essence, scaling the server up or down. The original server is >>> saved for a period of time to allow rollback if there is a problem. >>> All resizes should be tested and explicitly confirmed, at which time >>> the original server is removed. *All resizes are automatically >>> confirmed after 24 hours if they are not explicitly confirmed or >>> reverted*. >>> >>> http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-compute/1.1/content/Resize_Server-d1e3707.html >>> >>> Cheers >>> Nachi Ueno >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
