On Jan 26, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
A) This wasn't documented at all (AFAIK), so there's no concern of breaking
contracts.
I agree, it shouldn't break anything.
B) Even if it's moved to an extension, would the call change from it's current
form?:
DELETE /tokens/{token_id}
I'm not sure what the extension convention is here.
We could put that in a separate URI, but I don't think we have to in this case.
DELETE has a very well understood semantics. I can't see a DELETE that would
work in anyway different than this one.
-Dolph Mathews
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Ziad Sawalha
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If a client has bound to the contract XSD, they will break if we add this,
won't they?
But… I don't know how many clients would have bound to the OS-KSADM contracts.
We've been diligent and strict about not changing the core contract, but this
is the first time we've been presented with a change to an extension like this.
I'd still lean towards the "correct" practice of adding this as another
extension. Especially since that extension would only be adding a new method on
an existing resource, so would not require complex naming changes…
Open to alternative points of view..
Z
From: Jorge Williams
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:36:13 -0600
To: Dolph Mathews <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Yee, Guang" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ziad
Sawalha <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone: is revoke token API "officially" supported
Moving it to an extension makes sense to me. Ziad, does it make sense to add
it to OS-KSADM...or is this a different extension all together...revoke token
extension?
-jOrGe W.
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
It is definitely not a documented call (hence the "should this be removed?"
comment in the implementation); if it were to be "promoted" from undocumented
to an extension, I imagine it would belong in OS-KSADM.
- Dolph
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Yee, Guang
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I see it implemented in the code as
DELETE /v2.0/tokens/{tokenId}
But it doesn’t appear to be documented in any of the WADLs.
Thanks!
Guang
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
