Hi Juerg, That's because 'owner' is not supported as an explicit parameter to 'glance add'.
So as a result the CLI treats it a generic image property, and passes this to the API service via the header: x-image-meta-property-owner: 2 The 'x-image-meta-property-' prefix is used to distinguish additional image properties, separate to the first class image attributes. Please raise a bug against the glance CLI so that 'owner' is supported as an explicit field for the add command (as it currently is for the update command). Cheers, Eoghan > Is there a particular reason why an owner can't be specified when > adding an image? I.e., the following: > > $ glance add name=testing owner=99 < testing > > results in: > > URI: http://jabba:9292/v1/images/22 > Id: 22 > Public: No > Name: testing > Status: active > Size: 36614 > Disk format: None > Container format: None > Minimum Ram Required (MB): 0 > Minimum Disk Required (GB): 0 > Owner: 2 > Property 'owner': 99 > > whereas I expect it to be: > > URI: http://jabba:9292/v1/images/22 > Id: 22 > Public: No > Name: testing > Status: active > Size: 36614 > Disk format: None > Container format: None > Minimum Ram Required (MB): 0 > Minimum Disk Required (GB): 0 > Owner: 99 > > > Regards > ...Juerg > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
