On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 10:14 AM, Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services) wrote: > >> IMHO, if it is a quota related to a tenant or user, then managing it in >> Keystone makes sense. >> > > I think, as Eoghan mentioned, there was pretty broad agreement that > *storing* quota information and even the CRUD operations on it were > appropriate for Keystone to do, but the actual enforcement of quotas should > be left in individual projects. > That's how I remember it, too. Doug
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
