Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > *Core Cleanup* > [...] > If a former core member has time to start participating in reviews > again, i think he should be able to review for a couple of weeks or two > and send an email to the list saying, "Hey, I've got time to review > again, can I be added back in". If we don't here any -1 votes by other > core members for three days we will bring them back. In other words, > its former members can be accelerated back into core. Sound reasonable?
Yes. > *Blueprint Cleanup* > > As I mentioned in my previous email, I've now obsoleted all blueprints > not targetted to folsom. The blueprint system has been used for "feature > requests", and I don't think it is working because there is no one > grabbing unassigned blueprints. I think it has to be up to the drafter > of the blueprint to find a person/team to actually implement the > blueprint or it will just sit there. Therefore I've removed all of the > "good idea" blueprints. This was kind of sad, because there were some > really good ideas there. We discussed for quite some time that "wishlist" bugs that don't get worked on for some time should be closed as "Opinion/Wishlist"... and use that search to get a nice list of "things that sound like a good idea but nobody has had time to work on". Maybe we should create wishlist bugs for stuff on obsoleted blueprints, so that we have a single place to look for abandoned good ideas ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp