Big +1 on that. - Gabriel
> -----Original Message----- > From: openstack-bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula....@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:openstack- > bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of > Vishvananda Ishaya > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:41 PM > To: David Mortman > Cc: Openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) > (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) > Subject: Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom > > > On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:36 PM, David Mortman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya > > <vishvana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Two thoughts: > > > > 1) I think this is the wrong forum to poll operators on their > > preferences in general > > > > 2) We don't yet even have a fully laid out set of requirements and > > steps for how someone would convert or how hard it will be. > > Historically (with openstack and software in general), it is _always_ > > harder to upgrade then we think it will be. I'm an optimist and I > > think it will be a disaster... > > > Excellent points. Let me make the following proposal: > > 1) Leave the code in nova-volume for now. > 2) Document and test a clear migration path to cinder. > 3) Take the working example upgrade to the operators list and ask them for > opinions. > 4) Decide based on their feedback whether it is acceptable to cut the nova- > volume code out for folsom. > > Vish > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp