On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:30 AM, thingee <thin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Everybody >> >> I'd like to propose Ollie Leahy for cinder core. He has been doing >> plenty of reviews and bug fixes, provided useful and tasteful negative >> reviews (something often of far higher value than a +1) and has joined >> in various design discussions. >> > > I do find Ollie's reviews insightful, but given the current review stats > , I'd like to see that more near average with the rest of core. > > Besides numbers in reviews I'm mostly looking at bug triaging/fixes and > involvement in the ML and IRC with Cinder. > > With that in mind, given the discussions that have been going on and the > direction , I'm going to have to give a -1. > > I absolutely welcome Ollie to self nominate or be nominated by myself if > that improves after 30 days.  > > Thanks, > Mike Perez > >  - http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/cinder-reviewers-30.txt >  - > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/012079.html >  - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : email@example.com > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > While I think Ollie provides fantastic detailed reviews (and he's a cool dude), I'd like to see more of them as well. So for now I'm going to have to vote with a -1.
As Cinder grows I think we need to be taking a closer look at the review activity by ALL of the core team members. John
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp