On Sep 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:

> Excerpts from Michael Basnight's message of 2013-09-09 07:57:34 -0700:
>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Giuseppe Galeota <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> So, I think that "Trove is designed to support a single-tenant database 
>>> within a Nova instance" is a misleading definition. What do you think?
>> 
>> What exactly is misleading about that? Don't get me wrong, I've been working 
>> on trove for a long time, so to me, the definition makes sense. But if its 
>> misleading for newcomers, lets work to make it sound less so!
>> 
>> Also, removing openstack-dev list. This is more general question stuff 
>> that's suited for openstack mailing list. 
>> 
> 
> The misleading thing to me is that it sounds like I only get one database
> user. As in, it creates an instance, spins up MySQL, and creates a single
> tenant inside the database.
> 
> It also is ambiguous enough that one might miss the significance of the
> dash and hear that it creates a single, tenant-database.
> 
> As nice as succinct descriptions are, it may be worth clarifying all of
> the objects in the sentence.
> 
> Perhaps: "Trove is designed to support a multi-user database for a single
> OpenStack tenant within a Nova instance."

+1. Very succinct, and it does remove ambiguity. Giuseppe, feel free to update 
the wiki to reflect this, and help remove ambiguity in other areas. Thank you 
Clint and Giuseppe.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to