Guys, I'm trying to figure out the main differences between FWaaS and "Security Groups".
* Does it complement each other? Or is FWaaS a "Security Groups" replacement...? * Can FWaaS manage the "Tenant Namespace Router NAT Table"? * Does FWaaS manage the same iptables/ip6tables tables at L3 Namespace router in which the "Security Groups" already manages too? For example, two commands to do (almost) the same thing? Like this: Open TCP port 80: FWaaS: neutron firewall-rule-create --protocol tcp --destination-port 80 --action allow Security Groups: neutron security-group-rule-create --direction ingress --protocol tcp --port_range_min 80 --port_range_max 80 <security_group_uuid> I'm a bit confused about the aims and proposals of each approach / project... Thanks! Thiago
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
