On 4 November 2013 10:46, Julien De Freitas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Razique,
>
> Thanks for the link !
> I read the full discussion and as I tought there is no real perfect
> solution so far.
> I think i'll continue to use nexenta because it's a great solution and
> i'll set up multi back end storage for cinder in order to test ceph block
> storage.
> For meta data storage i'll do some test with CephFS because not production
> ready mean a lot and nothing at the same time.
> I your previsous mail you said  "the FS kept hanging on high load, so I
> considered it to be pretty unstable for OpenStack", but if it was  kept
> hanging on high load it should be pretty stable ? what was the load ? Can
> you share more detail with us ?
> That's a pity that we could not find any neutral heavy test out there.
>

If you consider Ceph you should take a look at Ceph RBD not CephFS (
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd/). It is stable and works great for me.

-- 
Maciej Gałkiewicz
Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin
http://shellycloud.com/, [email protected]
KRS: 0000440358 REGON: 101504426
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to