Hello, Issue solved. I had some stupid wiring problems :-)
Regards, Matej ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matej <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM Subject: Two flat networks To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Hi, I was able to solve all the problems that I had with getting one flat network in the same subnet as I have a router in - 192.168.22.0/24. Instances successfully get IP addresses in the desired pool and the communication works perfectly. As an "upgrade" to that I still want to use my public IP subnet ( 102.203.103.80/29) directly on the instances. I have now changed two lines in ovs_neutron_plugin.ini to: network_vlan_ranges = physnet1,physnet2 bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-em1,physnet2:br-em2 and created new bridge br-em2 on compute and controller nodes. I have connected em2 to a separate port on the HW switch. Network and subnet via neutron are created successully (network is using physnet2) and I can ping the hw router's default gateway from DHCP server's namespace: However, there are absolutely no DHCP DISCOVER messages from the instance in the syslog as they are for the first flat network. I can see in neutron's server.log that two physnets (physnet1 and physnet2) are created successfully and since the first one is working I have no ideas why the second - physnet2 doesn't. Any ideas on where to look and what to do will be very welcome :) TIA, Matej
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
