Hi Jeff, in a nutshell, Neutron has its IPAM logic baked into the main 'db class'. However, Neutron's IPAM does not manage at all the underlay - it manages exclusively devices in the 'logical' realm.
There are been discussions in the past concerning Physical appliance management in Neutron, not just from an IPAM perspective. However, so far there is not yet anything targeted or proposed for the upcoming Juno release. Regards, Salvatore On 23 June 2014 19:39, Jeff dambly <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’m new to OpenStack, and I was wondering what the community is using for > IPAM solutions. It seems to me that neutron is doing something of these > things, but how is IPAM being handled for underlay devices such as routers > and switches? > > > > > > > *Jeff d’Ambly*Principal Software Engineer, Symantec Corporation > > *www.symantec.com* <http://www.symantec.com/> > *________________________________* > > > > *Mobile: *(408) 431-6061 > * Jeffrey_d’[email protected] <[email protected]>* > *________________________________* > > > > [image: Symantec] <http://www.symantec.com/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
