What was the problem with metadata workers set to 2 ? Tim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Morrison [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 03 September 2014 00:55 > To: Abel Lopez > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] RabbitMQ issues since upgrading to > Icehouse > > Hi Abel, > > We were running Havana on Precise before. We moved to Icehouse on Trusty. > So new kombu etc. too. > We also moved to new rabbit servers so all the queues were fresh etc. > > Joe: Yeah we have metadata_workers set to 2 also, a little gotcha for the > icehouse upgrade. > > Cheers, > Sam > > > > On 3 Sep 2014, at 6:28 am, Abel Lopez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What release were you running before Icehouse? > > I'm curious if you purged/deleted queues during the upgrade. > > Might be useful to start fresh with your rabbit, like completely trash your > mensia during a maintenance window (obviously with your services stopped) so > they recreate the queues at startup. > > Also, was kombu upgraded along with your openstack release? > > > > On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Sam Morrison <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Since upgrading to Icehouse we have seen increased issues with messaging > relating to RabbitMQ. > >> > >> 1. We often get reply_xxxxxx queues starting to fill up with unacked > messages. To fix this we need to restart the offending service. Usually > nova-api > or nova-compute. > >> > >> 2. If you kill a node so as to force an *ungraceful* disconnect of rabbit > >> the > connection "object?" still sticks around in rabbit. Starting the service again > means there are now 2 consumers. The new one and the phantom old one. This > then leads to messages piling up in the unacked queue. This feels like a > rabbit > bug to me but just thought I'd mention it here too. > >> > >> > >> We have have a setup that includes icehouse computes and havana computes > in the same cloud and we only see this on the icehouse computes. This is using > Trusty and RabbitMQ 3.3.4 > >> > >> > >> Has anyone seen anything like this too? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sam > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-operators mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
