Ivan, see if it provides an answer: https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/55307/overcommitting-value-in-novaconf/
Regards, Eugene. On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:55 PM, James Downs <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:34:32PM +0000, Ivan Derbenev wrote: > > > if both vms start using all 64gb memory, both of them start using swap > > Don't overcommit RAM. > > > So, the question is - is it possible to prioritize 1st vm above 2nd? so > the second one will fail before the 1st, to leave maximum possible > perfomance to the most importan one? > > Do you mean CPU prioritization? There are facilities to allow one VM or > another to have CPU priority, but what, if a high priority VM wants RAM, > you want to OOM the other? That doesn't exist, AFAIK. > > Cheers, > -j > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ > openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ > openstack >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
