----- Stefan Seyfried <[email protected]> a écrit : > Am 09.09.2013 21:33, schrieb [email protected]: > > Hi, > > > > > > ----- Stefan Seyfried <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi all, > >> > >> after Andreas' and Guillaume's great HOWTO, I finally pulled out my > >> raspi over the weekend and played with it. > >> > >> It works pretty well. > >> However, the system is pretty unstable with the 3.1 kernel. > >> I noticed when trying to build ffmpeg from source. Lots of strange > >> errors, from ext4 complaining about delayed allocation to spurios > >> "ENOPERM" when closing temporary files during compilation etc. > >> Also, the raspberrypi-gfx demo/test tools did not work, erroring with > >> messages about "vcihq not connected" in dmesg. > >> > >> Additionally, my 512MB Raspi only had 256MB available, no matter what > >> amount of gpu_mem I put into config.txt. > >> > >> Then I simply grabbed the binary kernel and modules from > >> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux and new firmware from > >> https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware and voila -- the little box was > >> running stable. > >> > >> So I took the kernel from > >> devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi:kernel-3.6 and updated the patch > >> set to yesterdays git and changed the configuration to be pretty similar > >> to what is in the "upstream" git. > > > > Sounds good. :) > > > >> > >> I also updated the firmware package. > >> > >> Both together run very fine for me. I have all RAM available, the test > >> tools work, etc.pp. > >> > >> So maybe it would make sense to use the 3.6.11 kernel as "upstream" > >> Raspberry Pi also does? > > > > Make sense to me. > > > >> > >> I created SRs 198076 (raspberrypi-firmware) and 198080 > >> (kernel-raspberrypi) and maybe we should use > >> devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi:kernel-3.6 as the default raspi > >> kernel? > > > > I accepted your firmware patch but I have not the rigths to accept kernel > > SR. > > Well, if nobody objects, I could just SR it to Contrib:Raspi (without > :kernel-3.6 subproject), but I'd wait for comments before doing so :-)
If it is accepted to Contrib:RPi, then we could remove :kernel-3.6 subproject > > > Thanks for your help. > > Actually, I sort of promised Alex at the Chemnitz Linux Days in spring > that I would try to get openSUSE on Raspi into good shape, but > unfortunately got always sidetracked. So helping out now that the hard > work is done is the least I can do :-) Alex, thanks for the recruitment! ;) > > Best regards, > > Stefan > > P.S: I built the kernel in home:seife:ARM so you can take it from there > for testing. Will try it tomorow. Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
